PC BUT NOT TOO PC
by TOMMIE HOWELL

 Keeping Safe and Exclusive

Well, this may be my first ranting that will get me that all-important "Scourge of the Polymer Clay World" title. It is my hope to keep this rant as informative as possible, but I guarantee I will not be able to keep from tossing down the soapbox from time to time. I preface my remarks by saying that I am not against safety per se. Taking prudent precautions in all areas of life is a good enough thing. However, encasing oneself in a bubble that hampers one's actual living or becomes so much alarmist rhetoric is just goofy.

I have been following the latest installment of the second longest debate in the universe. This can be found on the various clay-oriented posting groups. I keep thinking this horse has got to be dead, but I'll be danged if people don't just go on beating it.

This poor horse has a name. That name is "polymer clay safety." When reading this debate, one who is unschooled in the history and use of polymer clay would probably rank polymer clay right up there with dioxin, nuclear waste, and rat poison. I have read posts and e-mails from people just starting with polymer clay who have been about ready to take the stuff back to the store. I am going to examine some realities here. I do not speak for people who have specific reactions to the clay; I know there are some. I am speaking in the terms of the general populace.

With that said, let's get started.

 

TESTING ART MATERIALS

All of the widely available polymer clays have been tested from stem to stern by the prestigious Arts & Crafts Materials Institute (ACMI). This Boston-based organization does not take this testing lightly nor do they balk at rejecting materials that don't make muster. Polymer clay has been found, by ACMI, to have the status of non-toxic, and as such, bears the ACMI seal of approval.

Now please indulge me here, this is going to get a little heady. I have done a lot of research for this rant; some of the information that I have found is quite wordy. I believe, however, that if we take the time to digest it, we will be better off for the information.

In the early 1980s, the manufacturers of artists and crafts materials began to voluntarily submit their products to the ACMI for testing. A group of manufacturers, artist's organizations, and health professionals worked to put together the standards by which the submitted products would be judged. That standard is ASTM D-4236.

If you look on your packet of clay you will see a notification that the polymer clay conforms to the ASTM D-4236 standard. Any product with this label is certified to be "properly labeled in a program of toxicological evaluation by a medical expert." A toxicological review board then reviews the findings of the medical expert. After all this is done, only then can a material bear the label that it conforms to this standard.

The ASTM D-4236 standard is meant for art materials for adults. There has been a standard for children in effect since the late 1930's! A product that has been tested under the children's standard will bear one of two titles. "CP" indicates a certified product has undergone the testing process. "AP" indicates the product has undergone the test and been approved for use by children.

So what does this "AP" status (which you can see on your packet of polymer clay) mean in a practical sense? It means that polymer clay has been "certified by an authority on toxicology associated with a leading university to contain no materials in sufficient quantities to be toxic or injurious to the body, even if ingested." (Emphasis mine)

In the early 1980s, Ralph Nader's Public Interest Research Group (PIRG) decided to take a look at these standards. Since the labeling was voluntary, people were still using materials that could be unsafe. PIRG worked with the Center for Safety in the Arts and many legislators to get some laws passed that would require materials used in schools to be certified as non-toxic. California passed the first such law in 1984 and was followed by six other states in the mid 1980s.

All of this activity led to the 1988 Labeling of Hazardous Art Materials Act. This act was backed by PIRG, the American Association of School Administrators, the American Association of Pediatrics, the American Health Association, Artists Equity, the Center for Safety in the Arts, the NEA, the PTA, manufacturers of art products, dealers, and the artists themselves.

The law went into effect on November 18, 1990. It was then and now mandatory under federal law that an artist material must bear a hazard label if it is not certified as non-toxic! They define an artist material as "any substance marketed or represented by the producer or repackager as suitable for use in any phase of the creation of any work of visual or graphic art of any medium." (Sounds to me like polymer clay fits in there.) Beyond this, even materials some artists use that are not considered an "artist material" must still be labeled by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration.

Now here is where we get down to some nitty gritty. In the fall of 1992, the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) came up with their final statement on labeling requirements. The ASTM D-4236 standard was modified as follows:

A substance is a hazard if it is a known or probable human carcinogen, and has a cancer risk of one in one million or more, or is a known or probable neurotoxic or reproductive or developmental toxicant, and if exposure is above a certain defined level (Allowable Daily Intake).

This modification takes into account such things as:

  • Chronic health effects in adults and children
  • Which chemicals have the potential to cause adverse health effects such as cancer and reproductive maladies
  • How much can be absorbed into the body or bioavailability
  • Acceptable daily intake levels

If there is an upper limit on how much contact one can have with a material, it must be stated in a warning label. Polymer clay would be required by federal law to carry such a warning if it was toxic in any of these ways. In fact, polymer clay bears no warnings of any kind!

Who else has good things to say about polymer clay? Ever hear of Consumer Reports Magazine? In their research, they found no adverse effects due to polymer clay even in reports of people and pets that had eaten it. Recently a polymer clay artist reported to the posting groups that she had eaten a "grape sized" bit of clay by accident. She is still with us.

 

FUMES

Now let me move on to some specific concerns. Many people are concerned about the "fumes" from baking clay. The normal baking of clay may produce some smell, I find that smell pleasant but others do not. The only fumes that are produced come from burning the clay. Even these fumes, while quite nasty to smell, have no chronic effect.

The people at Fimo tell us that burning clay releases hydrochloride gas. This gas can irritate the mucus membranes and cause stinging of the eyes, nose, and throat. The response to burning clay they recommend, and what a prudent person would do, is to turn off the oven and vacate the area until the gas dissipates.

You stand more risk from your Teflon cooking pans than from burning polymer clay.

What about those pesky phthalates? People say "Okay, Okay! You win on the clay itself but those plasticizers will getcha!" Long ago in a less cautious time, dioctyl phthalate (DOP) was used in the plasticizers. This use has been banned and DOP no longer is used in the making of polymer clay.

The concern over this particular phthalate is what causes all the uproar. Think of it like Red Dye #2. They have red M&M candies again, because other red dyes were used that don't have the harmful effect that RD#2 had. The phthalates used in polymer clay today are monitored under all of the hazardous materials testing that I presented earlier. Remember, if it contained known human carcinogens, polymer clay would be required by federal law to bear a warning label. Again, polymer clay bears no such warning.

 

CURING IN THE OVEN

Many are concerned about baking in their home ovens. One of the beautiful things about polymer clay is that it is a material that can be brought to permanence without the expense of a kiln or other additional firing device. This is a drawing point for many people; otherwise they would work with earth clay for sculptures and glass for making beads and millefiori.

The only reason you would need a separate oven, let alone put the dang thing outside, is if you don't like the smell of the baking polymer clay. If you clean your oven on a routine basis, you have no worries from cooking your dinner in the same oven that you baked your clay in earlier that day.

 

FOOD AND POLYMER CLAY

If polymer clay is non-toxic, why then, you might ask, can't you put food in a polymer clay bowl? Well, let me tell you it has a lot more to do with the food than the clay. The inert baked clay is not going to poison you. Polymer clay is not a food grade plastic mainly because it is very porous. You cannot clean it well enough to insure no little bugs are going to grow in leftover food.

People naturally assume that a material that is not food grade is somehow dangerous. This is not always the case. While there are some materials -- some pottery, for example, contains lead in the earth clay -- that are in fact dangerous in and of themselves, polymer clay is not one of them. Polymer clay's story is that it simply doesn't sanitize well.

I know this has been a very long edition of PC, not too PC, but I think it is an important one. One well-known clayer has suggested that the scares over polymer clay toxicity have grown due to the duplicity of early polymer clay artists who thought, "If we scare people off, there will be less competition." Then those scares grow and get passed around innocently by people who are genuinely concerned.

No one can say if this allegation is true or not. I would say that it is a possibility. If you feel the need to take a lot of precautions in order to feel safe, I will not tell you that you shouldn't.

I would ask, however, that you not go around promoting precautions as the way to go because it scares talented new people from picking up the clay. We lose new blood over this sort of thing.

Use your common sense when you work with clay. Don't make a meal of it, but don't freak if your miniature poodle happens to chomp on some. And if you screw up and use a knife that you cut clay with to butter your toast one morning, you don't have to call poison control.

The very last thing I have to say on this topic will perhaps be the most vehement. There is a statement that I have seen in various forms over the past few years. It is a question that just chaps my butt: "Would you want to find out (10,15,20) years from now that you gave (yourself, your family, your pet) some kind of (cancer, disease, demon possession) from polymer clay?"

To be honest with you, I want to say, "Oh, hell yeah! I want to give them bubonic plague, Ebola, and the heartbreak of psoriasis too!"

This question is a classic case of what Aristotelian logic calls the fallacy of hyperbole. When there are no facts to back up an argument, the only thing left to do is state your case in the most outrageous and frightening way you possibly can.

So basically, I contend that the most dangerous thing about polymer clay is trying to use a wavy blade. And I know a certain couple in Wisconsin who have even solved that issue. (Ask Irene Coyer over at Polymer Clay Haven about her blade handle. It's cool!) Until we meet again, my friends, I will continue to be loved and vilified here in the way too dry Pacific Northwest.

 

  Letters to the Editor | Beginners' Corner | You've Got Questions, We've Got Answers | Technique of the Month | Creator's Block | Mica Shift Part TwoElise Winters Interview | Darlene Kulczycki Interview | Monet Cane | Rainbow Jellyroll Keyring | Book Necklace | Balloon Flower Cane | Varathane Dipping Part Two | Issues in the Crafting World | Art in Transition | Glass Attic | E-mail Us | Home